Short answer: yes they do!

If you've ever wondered about the female libido, other biological differences between the genders, the dangers of birth control pills, cultural differences between times and places, the polygamous cultures of old, mating selection, the masculanization of the world via conquest, midwifery and witchery, modern feminism, the church, Playgirl, movies directed by women, Fifty Shades of Grey and everything in between: this is it.

It may not have the best interviewer (don't get me started on all those 'really's), or the most natural interviews, but she does shed light on some really interesting topics, even if it's most definitely both directed from, and towards, a more female perspective. It feels like they do try to keep it bias-free, though. Cater to all audiences. Take up the topics above in a way that'd interest everyone, and I do agree: I wouldn't mind seeing more authentic sex scenes in movies either. If women had stayed on top of the movie directing game I wonder how different the titles we'd be seeing today would be... yet with the surplus of strong female-leads in movies these days I wonder if they aren't getting there again. If men are the ones directing these movies with the female audience in mind it'd explain why I just really don't like them, though. They feel angled. The new Ghostbusters. The new MIB. It's a trend that brings out the strong woman over man, and yet in a way shames her with an added arrogance and superiority that I'm sure neither gender really wants to see. Or do they?

That's beyond the scope of this movie though, and I didn't really get a statistical or definitive answer on who has the higher sex drive either, but I did learn a lot. In terms of content I'd rate this higher, but as for the full picture:

 rated 3/5: not bad

FLASHOUT (90 minutes) SYNOPSIS: Inside a space habitat in a parallel universe, three young women play the blind date reality game InterMate in order to experience the euphoria of the FLASHOUT. Unexpectedly they find themselves trapped on Earth seeking the missing player of their game. They encounter a jogger, a rocker, a biker, an exploitative owner of an escort service, a radio telescope supervisor, and others vulnerable to their ecstatic FLASHOUT. All the while they are pursued by an awkward Reality Repairman whose assignment is to seal the hole between realities before the Multiverse is permanently altered.

This one's a spacey one! Abrim with special effects, and girls, most notably Allison Dunbar (though she's not from the future - also hope I'm not mixing together names).

It's about a realm where people (girls, in this case) play virtual games, but get tricked into a different world by another player, who seeks to end their universe, but he messes up when he can't get one of the girls to interact with him, so he calls and escort and... hmm? Sounds messy? The synopsis above probably makes more sense than the plot does within the movie itself.

Because it is. It's very messy. The acting's unstable and the special effects are all but realistic, but it's not without entertainment value. A e s t h e t i c s. You know. It's fun, charming, and creatively unique, but not without flaws. A fun and near-decent tale of intergalactic neighbors, that might've been pretty cool with a bigger budget, richer scenery and effects. But maybe most of all: a more fleshed-out and apprehensible plot.

 rated 2.5/5: almost not bad

No it's not about a submarine. I thought that too at first.

It's a typical run down cop story... with a twist. Reminds me of Memento. Hope that's not a spoiler.

Nicole Kidman (she's so in character I had no idea it was her!) plays a killer main character though. It's unusual with a female lead - well at least it used to be, but even more unusual now with a weak female lead. A rundown one, I mean. She's strong in her own way. But a lead that shows weakness, and bad personality traits, while at the same time being female. That's new. That's unusual.

I feel in these overly feminist times that's a rare thing to dare showcase - but it's something I'm happy to see. The world like it is. Nuances. And she's a pretty bad-ass persona, run down or no.

The movie's definitely not one of the most positive ones I've seen in recent times. It leaves you... feeling like you've watched a good movie, but not particularly happy about it. It's simple. it's complex. It combines flashbacks with real-time in a clever way, family relations and work, existential tidbits, and the time's as much a mesh as the rest of the movie. It's refreshing that way. Refreshingly truthful too, and dark, even on the bright of day. The atmosphere reminds me a bit of Dirty - another cop movie with similary saturated scenery, which I both liked and didn't like at the same time. Didn't like mainly because it was plain depressing. And this was similar, though thankfully it also felt like a movie with a cause.

This one I do like. It's a new take on the franchise, and a very personal story that follows a sequence of events that doesn't necessarily seem obvious, but is very well-selected after all. You'll see when it goes full circle. It's like a movie made up of those moments you see when your journey's over, and your life flashes in front of your eyes.

 rated 4.5/5: almost awesome

A South Korean crime squad arrested 30 gangsters in 2004.

It doesn't sound all that sensational when they say it like that, but that's how they end it! Factually. Matter-of-factedly. I guess it's a cultural thing?

Until the end: it's a blast. It really is. South Korean action has an edge of realness to it, but also an element of: not so serious? How do I put it. They slap each other rather than punch each other. Where the Malaysian/Indonesian action movies have people slicing off fingers with knifes, these guys slap people with their hands... sometimes. But with this one it does get a bit fiercer than most, maybe because some of the anti-heroes come from across the border, and when it's all over it was a blast. Really. Korean action based upon facts, charismatic actors and tact. Good villain, message, and everything. It's a solid movie all the way.

 rated 4/5: fo shizzle

It's a Jet Li classic. One of the legendary ones.

Reminds me a bit of IP Man with the setting taking place during the war, and the Japanese invasion, but the style otherwise is not all the same. If you haven't seen either this one or the other you'd better get going. It's martial arts at their finest, both with the dignity and the dynamic duo motion and mastery. And a tale of vengeance that seems to always work just as well. They shatter glass, they test their friendship, and love, and discipline, even if the main character never wavers. He's a bit like Fong Sai-yuk, huh? Feels like that role's almost become a part of his personality.

But regardless of the characters, this is just one of those movies you need to see. One of my definitive Hall of Fame martial art movie selections that I seem to keep coming back to, again and again, to enjoy the fights but also the characters, and the simplicity of the times. Great watch.

 rated 5/5: friggin awesome

It's the eighties! The synth, the style, the Japanese, the bar... it's got all those good things a movie of the sort really needs, complete with a slow intro and cliche (but likable - or non-likable depending on the type) character. Tough guys all over. Love it.

It's a movie of the times, simple and rough, detailing a derailed artifact trade - which a Japanese crime boss just happen to have a great interest in.

I recognize some of the tough guys too: Ross Hagen, Mako, David Carradine and Lee Van Cleef. All good. And the guy who's face they keep zooming in on - the disfigured henchmen earned a roll by those unique traits of his. And of course there's a girl. It's nothing fancy, but it's good action, as flashbacks to the eighties always entail. Those were the days.

 rated 3/5: not bad